
Figures revealed in the WA Parliament show the median time it takes to get to see a developmental paediatrician in Perth has increased to 23.9 months. This is deeply concerning, as it means at least 50% of patients will be waiting much longer than the two-year period.
For many families, this wait will be just the start of a journey and does not account for further long waits for autism assessments. For the families currently waiting, it means stress and uncertainty, associated with a lack of diagnosis; and it may also mean years without access to therapy and school support that are often tied to a diagnosis.
The wait-time figures continue to grow. Concerningly, it was reported in September 2025 that nearly 12,000 children were waiting to see a paediatrician. A two-year wait to see a paediatrician for these children is far too long. There is overwhelming evidence that early intervention makes a major difference, and we know there is a very tight window in early life when therapy is more effective. This translates into better long-term outcomes, not just in developmental domains but also in educational, social and mental health outcomes. There is a life-long cost to these kids if they’re not seen soon enough.
The waits for children with developmental issues extend beyond just the initial wait for paediatrician review. The parliamentary figures also show long wait times to see other developmental allied health staff. The wait time to see a clinical psychologist is now 11.4 months (fortunately down by half from 23.5 a year ago); 8.4 months for an occupational therapist; 5.4 months for a speech pathologist; 4.1 months for an audiologist, and 1.4 months for a physiotherapist.
The human costs for these kids and families of delayed diagnosis, and therefore support, should not be underestimated. These are families that already experience financial strain due to limited ability to work, or missed work, due to the care needs of their kids. Daycare may not be an option for many if their child has significant regulation and behavioural issues. These issues will only rise with the current cost of living pressures, and will only add to already high rates of carer burnout and social isolation.
The core problem is longstanding workforce shortages. There have been two parliamentary inquiries over the last two decades that document how WA Health’s Child Development Service (CDS) has continued to struggle. The most recent parliamentary select committee into child development services released their report in November 2023, and it makes clear that CDS has experienced an unprecedented surge in demand, with a 52% increase in referrals since 2013-14.
Despite this, there has not been a meaningful staffing increase for the last 14 years from 2010-2023. In 2010 there was a significant $49 million injection of funding, which did result in the halving of wait times. Following the recent 2023 inquiry report, the Government announced in 2024 an additional $38 million funding for CDS. While this funding is welcome, when considered relative to 2010, and with inflation and significantly larger waitlists, its impact is unlikely to be as large as required.
Even with that additional funding, it has not been easy to fill workforce gaps after 14 years of underfunding. Paediatric training pathways are generally longer, with most paediatricians being in training for 10 years before finally qualifying. It is part of the reason why workforce shortages cannot be fixed quickly, even following funding uplift.
The current struggles in CDS are the consequence of successive governments’ poor long-term planning and a health funding model that waits to react to the next crisis. WA kids cannot afford another 14 years to pass before CDS receives another meaningful staffing increase.
“The core problem is workforce shortages, not just in developmental paediatrics, but for a lot of the other sub-specialist paediatricians and paediatric surgeons as well. Fixing it needs a coordinated plan. We need to train more clinicians, and we need to put concerted effort into retaining more people than we train.
What we need is a long-term vision to tackle this problem. Obviously, we need more training positions, particularly in areas where the wait times are longest. Specifically, we need more developmental paediatricians. We also need to keep in mind that clinicians are currently carrying heavy caseloads, and there remains a risk of burnout – this can exacerbate the problem if people leave the health system altogether, or leave for other jurisdictions. Some thought must be given to rationalising people’s caseloads.
Recruiting more International Medical Graduates (IMGs) could help to boost our numbers, but that is not necessarily an easy solution to implement. We have to acknowledge, as Health Minister Meredith Hammat has articulated when talking about wait times, that WA is competing with every other state as well as internationally for a very small pool of specialists. And demand is growing faster across the country, and the training pipelines are too small.
The other issue is that when we’re parachuting in a person trained overseas, specialties like child development require knowledge of local systems and resources. So, IMGs need significant supervision and training as well, in a system where training is already limited due to already high workloads.
I believe the level of workforce pressure in paediatrics is not unique to WA, but is added to by our geographic isolation and spread which makes workforce distribution challenging. Telehealth has helped improve access for families in rural and regional areas. Workforce mobility for paediatric specialties both to urban and rural areas is required to ease geographic disparity in services and to deliver care closer to home.
While there is an investment in older adult community hubs by the Government, it would be good to see similar thought put to the paediatric community hubs to help with mobility of paediatric services in general. The fact remains that almost any solution to create better efficiency cannot be implemented without a larger workforce, and a need for a greater number of paediatric clinicians on the ground.
Looking to the long-term future, a lot of thought still needs to be given to support integration of services. This includes making funding available to pilot novel team-based care models that bridge between the silos of child development services, child and adolescent mental health services, and hospital services. We also need integration into the schools, where kids spend a significant portion of their lives.
I would hope that at some point we could embed OTs and speech pathologists into early education pathways, and start early in kindergarten and pre-kindergarten, where they reach out to identify children with difficulties as early as possible and provide support.
Early educators already do an amazing job of providing support to many vulnerable children, and often want and need guidance from developmental therapists to better help those with developmental differences. When we recognise that not all children learn in the same way, in school environments where accommodations and support are more universal, we often find all children benefit – not just those with the most need.
I write this final comment with awareness that our health system is under enormous pressure from an ageing population, with discourse being dominated by significant adult bed and ED pressures. I worry that in doing so, we forget about the littlest members of society and that their healthcare needs are equally urgent and important. The latest waitlist data represents their tiny cries for help.